To prevent this madness, I'll run against Bob, willingly.

Now I do believe he has the capability to be a good leader, and I do not doubt that he can handle pressure, but I do question his tactics and definition of fairness. You have seen his arguments and his interest in trying to manipulate to his advantage in his posts. I don't think we need a moderator that believes in his own ideas, and believes he and nobody else is right. I will stick up for the forums best interests and place in effect a better set of standards. Clearly written rules, and well proven ones at that, would be my first priority. I would definitely enforce them in the forum. I will try to be as fair and unbiased as I can. I will not take suggestions on the matters of the many problems that I may be asked to govern. I will make my words final.
Now that the sarcastic rebuttal of mine has been made, what do you think?
