I try it again before I go to bed tonight. Lets use this Topic: http://hookedforums.com/a/viewtopic.php?t=1085
After all it is stickied.
Guide to improve your game play!
- darthdroid
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:42 am
There's some good stuff here and I certainly agree with most of....the strategy stuff, I'm not into the wiki stuff
One thing I would disagree with: Upgrading your "highest profit" trains. Upgrading engines should be case by case and not because it's a top producer. I've fiddled with this a lot and a small engine might make a huge profit, then you upgrade it and within a year or two you're in the red, losing money.
Lots of people think you always want the biggest engines possible, this is only sometimes true, and on lots of maps I'd say never true.
Sometimes people load a game with all the engines...so when you make a train it's immediately some goliath engine. I always thought it was a strategy to trick you into spending 200-300k on some overbearing engine you don't need and I thought "hey, that's dirty, I like it." But then I look around and the guy that made the scenario is using all those monster engines....so it wasn't a trick.
Then i go and buy a bunch of small engines, have 8 of them to his/her 3 big ones and I'm triple or quadruple their profit in no time....they spent all their cash on engines lol.
My point is this: You choose an engine based on the following:
-Distance to travel
-Current engines ability to keep up with shipping said resource/s
-Stage of Game
Note, I didn't list "how much $ you have" as a factor as you can always buy an engine and a good investment is just that, regardless if you have the $.
So keep that in mind.
Also, you get the noobies online that start yapping about "stealing" and "thievery" like those little yipper dogs in the cars at the super market.
These people are just confused, as I always explain: You only own: Tracks, Engines, and Stations. NOT raw materials, NOT finished good, NOT cities. This is not really complex. The real issue is that a good player will run out of empty cities quicker than a lousy player and what's he/she supposed to do? Sit there and hope his cities produce more than yours??? lol that's just stupid.
And the game is not designed to be a race to the best cities and first come first serve. It's more like a race to the biggest snowball effect and the most efficient come get the best serve. So understand that "stealing" is a big part of the game and if you don't steal from her, she'll steal from you, so steal first and steal best, and steal the most!
It's like poker, a big part of it is to chop a leg off....cut his/her money in half. Is there any better business strategy than something that BOTH helps you and HURTS the competition? I think not.
With that in mind, get your own stash going and then assuming it's logistically feasible and economically viable, attack your biggest threat, invade invade invade. This will chop a leg off and put him/her on the defense. This is very important.
Take them out of their game, throw off their rhythm, this is the nature of business itself and the game is in my opinion a better business simulation than it is a train simulation.
Food for thought
One thing I would disagree with: Upgrading your "highest profit" trains. Upgrading engines should be case by case and not because it's a top producer. I've fiddled with this a lot and a small engine might make a huge profit, then you upgrade it and within a year or two you're in the red, losing money.
Lots of people think you always want the biggest engines possible, this is only sometimes true, and on lots of maps I'd say never true.
Sometimes people load a game with all the engines...so when you make a train it's immediately some goliath engine. I always thought it was a strategy to trick you into spending 200-300k on some overbearing engine you don't need and I thought "hey, that's dirty, I like it." But then I look around and the guy that made the scenario is using all those monster engines....so it wasn't a trick.
Then i go and buy a bunch of small engines, have 8 of them to his/her 3 big ones and I'm triple or quadruple their profit in no time....they spent all their cash on engines lol.
My point is this: You choose an engine based on the following:
-Distance to travel
-Current engines ability to keep up with shipping said resource/s
-Stage of Game
Note, I didn't list "how much $ you have" as a factor as you can always buy an engine and a good investment is just that, regardless if you have the $.
So keep that in mind.
Also, you get the noobies online that start yapping about "stealing" and "thievery" like those little yipper dogs in the cars at the super market.
These people are just confused, as I always explain: You only own: Tracks, Engines, and Stations. NOT raw materials, NOT finished good, NOT cities. This is not really complex. The real issue is that a good player will run out of empty cities quicker than a lousy player and what's he/she supposed to do? Sit there and hope his cities produce more than yours??? lol that's just stupid.
And the game is not designed to be a race to the best cities and first come first serve. It's more like a race to the biggest snowball effect and the most efficient come get the best serve. So understand that "stealing" is a big part of the game and if you don't steal from her, she'll steal from you, so steal first and steal best, and steal the most!
It's like poker, a big part of it is to chop a leg off....cut his/her money in half. Is there any better business strategy than something that BOTH helps you and HURTS the competition? I think not.
With that in mind, get your own stash going and then assuming it's logistically feasible and economically viable, attack your biggest threat, invade invade invade. This will chop a leg off and put him/her on the defense. This is very important.
Take them out of their game, throw off their rhythm, this is the nature of business itself and the game is in my opinion a better business simulation than it is a train simulation.
Food for thought
Last edited by darthdroid on Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Bob the Lunatic
- Star Ranger4
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:59 am
- darthdroid
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:42 am
- CalmDragon
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:08 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
What effect do various bridge types have on speed?
Do different bridge types have different effects?
More so than a grade or a curve effect?
Do different bridge types have different effects?
More so than a grade or a curve effect?
motherboard : Asus P5N-E SLI
processor: Dual Core 2.4 GHz
memory : 2046MB
video card: GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
operating system: winxp media
Display: 24" Dell at 1920x1200
processor: Dual Core 2.4 GHz
memory : 2046MB
video card: GeForce 8800GTS 640MB
operating system: winxp media
Display: 24" Dell at 1920x1200
- Star Ranger4
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:59 am