Smr Simple!

I keep getting booted out "in a Humiliating take over bid" during a game that I am playing, but I own 100% of my stock... I thought that made you safe?
Am I missing something here?

I suggest that you look over the Strategy thread. There are plenty discussions of your question.

http://www.hookedgamers.com/forums/view ... f=34&t=860
Jancsika

Well, If you own 100% of your stocks you are not safe. If somebody comes up with enough money to buy a stock, and does, you end up bought out.

Often times I will only buy 90% of stock and keep an eye on who is buying mine. I may then either buy them out, or sell some more so they do not get all of mine, nor do they get a good return on what they have bought already. Having the cash to buy them out is more fun though.

Usually I'm always buying stock by my self up to 70%, that is the safe position because if an AI want to buy out my stocks he needs three times to do it, that mean too I can monitoring how much money he needed to buy out my stocks

Rodea2007 wrote:Usually I'm always buying stock by my self up to 70%, that is the safe position because if an AI want to buy out my stocks he needs three times to do it, that mean too I can monitoring how much money he needed to buy out my stocks

I'm pretty sure it's only double Rodea. So if it costs $750,000 to buy an unowned stock, then it would cost $1,500,000 to buy the same stock from someone else (who owns it)-be it the AI or a human.

darthdroid wrote:

Rodea2007 wrote:Usually I'm always buying stock by my self up to 70%, that is the safe position because if an AI want to buy out my stocks he needs three times to do it, ...

I'm pretty sure it's only double Rodea. So if it costs $750,000 to buy an unowned stock, then it would cost $1,500,000 to buy the same stock from someone else (who owns it)-be it the AI or a human.

Not what he meant... 70% means 3 shares available, each one has to be bought singly. This gives you a chance to see what's happening.

keotaman wrote:

darthdroid wrote:

Rodea2007 wrote:Usually I'm always buying stock by my self up to 70%, that is the safe position because if an AI want to buy out my stocks he needs three times to do it, ...

I'm pretty sure it's only double Rodea. So if it costs $750,000 to buy an unowned stock, then it would cost $1,500,000 to buy the same stock from someone else (who owns it)-be it the AI or a human.

Not what he meant... 70% means 3 shares available, each one has to be bought singly. This gives you a chance to see what's happening.

Rodea was talking about monitoring how much cash the AI needed and said "three times"... So I took that to mean "triple cost of unowned stock", but perhaps you are right and Rodea means "three stocks".